Here's something I'll bet you didn't know: this blog is exactly five years old today. Quite a few things have happened since July 05. For a start, I wasn't married. I hadn't completed my novel. And I was allergic to any product bearing the Apple logo.
I never manage to post as many entries here as I'd like to, but I know my slackness hasn't deterred some of you from visiting regularly, so on this fifth anniversary of the creation of a conduit for my semi-coherent ramblings, I'd like to express heartfelt thanks to all my loyal readers.
I'm not sure what the next five years will bring, but I've got a fairly clear picture of the next month: the Divine L and I are off to enjoy the monsoon-soaked enticements of India. Blog posts will probably be few and far between, unless of course I happen to latch on to some Wifi at opportune moments.
Before I embark on my long flight, I'll leave you with a question: if you could go back in time and give one piece of advice to your five-years-younger self, what would it be? I think I'd probably say something like, "You need to push yourself harder, because before you know it, you'll be writing a post about the fifth anniversary of your blog..."
Hope August treats you all well,
D.
Dariush Alavi
A writer's blog
25 July 2010
23 June 2010
Rome's Trevi Fountain
Some of you will not be surprised to learn that I'm going to have to deprive you of my nonsensical musings for a short while. (Think: several red biros and lots and lots of paper.) But I'd like to leave you with something to do.
I discovered today that the average sum of money thrown into Rome's Trevi Fountain every single day is 3000 euros... which isn't really all that shocking. It is, after all, one of the must-see spots in one of the world's most popular cities - and it isn't exactly tiny - so it's not hard to imagine 3000 people throwing a euro each into it every day.
But anyway, your challenge is to come up with the most ingenious and discreet way of stealing one day's supply of coins. And here's a little incentive: I promise to send a little prize to whoever comes up with what I consider to be the best idea. No matter where you live in the world, I promise to send the prize to you.
The only condition is that you have to post your idea on the Comments section of this blog. Comments posted on Facebook will not be accepted: only those left on dariushalavi.com will be considered.
Your deadline: Wednesday 7th July 2010. Get going!
---
UPDATE 7th July 2010: The competition's over, folks. And you don't need me to tell you who the winner is. Congratulations, Rachel. Text me your current address and I'll send you the prize asap. Thanks for entering.
Labels:
comments,
competition,
ingenious plot,
marking,
money,
Rome,
Trevi Fountain
18 June 2010
Nature And Vacuums
I'm no scientist, but I believe there are currently three Laws Of Thermodynamics. I'd like to propose a fourth: systems will make active attempts to collapse.
What I mean is that we don't seem to be able to just let things tick over nicely for too long. If a difficulty doesn't pop up and attempt to topple a state of equilibrium, then we create one. It's almost as though something's always got to be inside our 'problem box'... which of course calls to mind the other law about nature and vacuums.
It's a weird, almost masochistic state of affairs, but it's unquestionably real, and I'm convinced it exists not just in families and workplaces, but also in the way our governments run our countries. Do we clutch on to some bare minimum of negativity because we feel it defines us? They say daylight would be meaningless without night. Perhaps we subconsciously feel our happiness is partly defined by our stresses and anxieties. So here's a thought for you: the next time you want to make an enjoyable event more pleasurable, immerse yourself in a crisis first.
---
PS. I've just checked out Wikipedia, and apparently there's also a 'zeroth' Law Of Thermodynamics... oh, and I think the Third Law basically expresses the same idea as my Fourth Law, which makes most of the above redundant... I did say I'm no scientist...
PPS. Chinua Achebe said it better: Things Fall Apart.
What I mean is that we don't seem to be able to just let things tick over nicely for too long. If a difficulty doesn't pop up and attempt to topple a state of equilibrium, then we create one. It's almost as though something's always got to be inside our 'problem box'... which of course calls to mind the other law about nature and vacuums.
It's a weird, almost masochistic state of affairs, but it's unquestionably real, and I'm convinced it exists not just in families and workplaces, but also in the way our governments run our countries. Do we clutch on to some bare minimum of negativity because we feel it defines us? They say daylight would be meaningless without night. Perhaps we subconsciously feel our happiness is partly defined by our stresses and anxieties. So here's a thought for you: the next time you want to make an enjoyable event more pleasurable, immerse yourself in a crisis first.
---
PS. I've just checked out Wikipedia, and apparently there's also a 'zeroth' Law Of Thermodynamics... oh, and I think the Third Law basically expresses the same idea as my Fourth Law, which makes most of the above redundant... I did say I'm no scientist...
PPS. Chinua Achebe said it better: Things Fall Apart.
Labels:
anxiety,
Chinua Achebe,
equilibrium,
happines,
Laws Of Thermodynamics,
misery,
people,
sadness,
stress,
Things Fall Apart,
Wikipedia
10 June 2010
Very Much Reality
One of the oldest pieces of parenting advice is that if a child asks you a question, your response should provide only as much detail as he or she would like. So, if a little one says, "Why did that man drive around the countryside killing people?" an initial reply might be, "I think it's because he was unwell." And if the child then doesn't come back with something like, "But what made him so unwell?" then you can assume that you've given as much info as he or she is willing to deal with at that moment. If a child wants more details, they'll ask more questions; they'll indicate to you where they'd like the line to be drawn.
I've been wondering lately if we take this attitude through into adulthood, and I suppose I've been prompted by the realisation that I know very little about certain topics which I'd claim are important to me. I accept that we can't all be experts on everything, but even so, I can't really explain why I'm not entirely clear on, say, what's currently happening in Iran, not just in relation to the UN's attitude to the country, but also in terms of the state of the lives of ordinary Iranians, trying to go about their daily business.
The same applies to the recent case of the aid ship stopped by Israeli troops. My knowledge of the details of the incident is patchy at best, despite the fact that I'd usually declare myself to be someone who wants to possess a full picture of what's happening in the Middle East.
And as for The Financial Crisis, well, my standard line in conversations about the subject is, "I don't really understand economics," after which I go on to spout the usual, hollow lines about the American housing market being at the root of the problem.
Of course, all this could be remedied. I could commit myself to reading a newspaper thoroughly once a week. I could subscribe to various experts' blogs. I could pick up the phone and talk to knowledgeable friends and relatives. But part of the point I'm trying to make is precisely that I avoid doing these things. Sure, there's only so much we can cram into one day and some endeavours have to be prioritised over others. But maybe, on some level, I'm reverting to a child-like state and exposing myself only to as much info as I feel I can bear. Maybe my subconscious isn't as opposed to blinkers as I'd like to believe. T S Eliot did once say that "humankind cannot stand very much reality". Could it be true that, for all my opposition to nanny-states and censorship, what I really want is a pat on the head and a promise that everything's going to be all right?
I've been wondering lately if we take this attitude through into adulthood, and I suppose I've been prompted by the realisation that I know very little about certain topics which I'd claim are important to me. I accept that we can't all be experts on everything, but even so, I can't really explain why I'm not entirely clear on, say, what's currently happening in Iran, not just in relation to the UN's attitude to the country, but also in terms of the state of the lives of ordinary Iranians, trying to go about their daily business.
The same applies to the recent case of the aid ship stopped by Israeli troops. My knowledge of the details of the incident is patchy at best, despite the fact that I'd usually declare myself to be someone who wants to possess a full picture of what's happening in the Middle East.
And as for The Financial Crisis, well, my standard line in conversations about the subject is, "I don't really understand economics," after which I go on to spout the usual, hollow lines about the American housing market being at the root of the problem.
Of course, all this could be remedied. I could commit myself to reading a newspaper thoroughly once a week. I could subscribe to various experts' blogs. I could pick up the phone and talk to knowledgeable friends and relatives. But part of the point I'm trying to make is precisely that I avoid doing these things. Sure, there's only so much we can cram into one day and some endeavours have to be prioritised over others. But maybe, on some level, I'm reverting to a child-like state and exposing myself only to as much info as I feel I can bear. Maybe my subconscious isn't as opposed to blinkers as I'd like to believe. T S Eliot did once say that "humankind cannot stand very much reality". Could it be true that, for all my opposition to nanny-states and censorship, what I really want is a pat on the head and a promise that everything's going to be all right?
03 June 2010
Just One Problem
I'm told I shouldn't eavesdrop on other people's conversations. My defence is that I never make a conscious effort to listen in. If certain sounds are loud enough to reach my ears, there's not very much I can do about that. And anwyay, why would I want to deprive myself of little gems like the one I recently overheard at King's Cross?
Picture a waif-like, 20-something blond - half her face covered by massive white sunglasses - talking on her mobile.
"Yah, but listen, listen, I've got to tell you something. ... I was putting my bins out the other day... What? No, they've changed it, it's Tuesdays now, but anyway, doesn't matter. Remember Hollie told me that her boss lives next door to me? ... Hollie with the mole. ... No, she hasn't had it removed, that was Gemma. Hollie's the one who's the marketing consultant. ... That's her. But anyway, listen to me. The bitch never told me her boss is good looking. And I mean really good looking. I mean seriously really. ... He was putting his bins out at the same time as me, and I just thought, 'Oh my God, there is no way that is Hollie's boss!' I mean, what a bitch. ... And I just said, 'Hi, are you Hollie's boss?' and he was like, 'Yah', and I was like, 'Oh fab. I'm her best friend,' and oh my God, you should've seen his smile. ... No, no ring. I'm pretty sure Hollie told me he's single. But anyway, later that day, I called Hollie and I was waiting for her to say something, but she didn't say a word, so I was like, 'I bumped into your boss this morning,' and she just went, 'Aha,' and I said, 'We chatted for ages,' and she goes, 'Aha,' and I said, 'Did he mention me at all?' and she just went, 'No.' But I know she's lying. I'm totally convinced she's lying. Bitch. I know he mentioned me to her. She's gotta be lying. ... Yah, yah, yah, I know, but I reckon I'm gonna go round to his later this week and say I've got a problem or something, like I can't flush the toilet, or something like that. I'll think of something. ... No, I mean properly good looking. ... Yah ... But there's just one problem. ... His name's Cliff."
And that was when I had to catch my train.
Picture a waif-like, 20-something blond - half her face covered by massive white sunglasses - talking on her mobile.
"Yah, but listen, listen, I've got to tell you something. ... I was putting my bins out the other day... What? No, they've changed it, it's Tuesdays now, but anyway, doesn't matter. Remember Hollie told me that her boss lives next door to me? ... Hollie with the mole. ... No, she hasn't had it removed, that was Gemma. Hollie's the one who's the marketing consultant. ... That's her. But anyway, listen to me. The bitch never told me her boss is good looking. And I mean really good looking. I mean seriously really. ... He was putting his bins out at the same time as me, and I just thought, 'Oh my God, there is no way that is Hollie's boss!' I mean, what a bitch. ... And I just said, 'Hi, are you Hollie's boss?' and he was like, 'Yah', and I was like, 'Oh fab. I'm her best friend,' and oh my God, you should've seen his smile. ... No, no ring. I'm pretty sure Hollie told me he's single. But anyway, later that day, I called Hollie and I was waiting for her to say something, but she didn't say a word, so I was like, 'I bumped into your boss this morning,' and she just went, 'Aha,' and I said, 'We chatted for ages,' and she goes, 'Aha,' and I said, 'Did he mention me at all?' and she just went, 'No.' But I know she's lying. I'm totally convinced she's lying. Bitch. I know he mentioned me to her. She's gotta be lying. ... Yah, yah, yah, I know, but I reckon I'm gonna go round to his later this week and say I've got a problem or something, like I can't flush the toilet, or something like that. I'll think of something. ... No, I mean properly good looking. ... Yah ... But there's just one problem. ... His name's Cliff."
And that was when I had to catch my train.
Labels:
conversation,
eavesdropping,
King's Cross,
London,
monologue,
station,
train
27 May 2010
The Combined Coolness
Is there a word to describe the feeling of coming full circle? 'Satisfaction' isn't quite deep enough. 'Completion' is somewhat emotionless. 'Accomplishment' implies too much intent. I suspect there is one somewhere, either in English or some other language, and if I knew what it was, I would've used it last Saturday evening.
Here's an understatement for you: Doctor Who was a significant part of my childhood. It didn't just capture my imagination: it pretty much defined it. It served as a springboard for almost all my adolescent writing. And it even shaped the way I speak today... but that's a story best saved for another post. So even though, in my opinion, the programme's 'new' version isn't anywhere as inventive or ingenious as what they're now calling 'the classic series', last Saturday's episode was always going to be special.
The reason for this, dear readers, is that the red force-field you see in the photo above, covering a plot of land in a Welsh village, was created by none other than my stepson. And what was even more special is that he watched the entire episode with me, which officially beat the combined coolness of meeting Tom Baker, having a chat with Matt Smith before he was a glint in the Daleks' eye-stalks and getting Sophie Aldred's autograph from a penpal. It was a wonderful moment which made me feel... well... rather full and rather circular.
Labels:
adolescence,
BBC,
childhood,
Daleks,
Doctor Who,
Dominic Alderson,
English,
family,
full circle,
Matt Smith,
speech,
Tom Baker,
vocabulary
21 May 2010
Volcano People - Chapter 1
Okay, here we go folks. I've been working on my volcano memoir for a few weeks and I'd very much like to share the first chapter with you. If you've got the time to read it, I'd love to know what you think.
---
Sirkeci Station, Istanbul, Sunday 18/4/10 2130
“Babe, I don’t think the lights are working.”
I’m sure Linda’s words didn’t quite register at first. I’d only just managed to throw our luggage off the wrong carriage and onto what we hoped was the correct one, so the fact that we might not be able to enjoy such luxuries as electricity was going to need a little longer to sink in. All that mattered at that moment – a mere thirty minutes before the scheduled departure time – was that the nine hours of queuing in the cold really had resulted in a bona fide train booking and that the train really was about to start heading in the direction of the UK, aka home.
I stood in the cabin doorway and could just about see Linda’s unmoving frame through the gloom, sitting on the bottom bunk with impressive calm. I glanced to my right. James and Edina – a couple we’d only met the day before but were about to get to know very well – were busy sorting themselves out in their cabin under the helpful glow of the fluorescent strip above their heads.
“What d’you mean they’re not working?”
“I mean I can’t turn them on. They don’t seem to be working.”
“But everyone else’s are.” I surveyed the corridor again, and sure enough, ours was the only cubicle in darkness. “Let me have a look.”
I walked in, convinced she simply hadn’t found the master switch that would solve the entire problem, and started running my hands along the walls and surfaces around me. A few moments later, my eyes adjusted to the dimness, and I found myself emitting a few chuckles.
“What’s so funny?”
“This cabin. I’m sure I’ve been in it before. Or one exactly like it.”
“Been in it before? What’re you talking about?”
On one side of our little enclosure were three bunks, the top one shorter than the other two, as though intended for a child. The walls were covered by a thin, scratched, fake-wood laminate that probably hadn’t looked half-decent since the early 80s. The radiator below the window was a battered, misshapen metal grille that wouldn’t have been out of place at a scrap yard. This was Soviet train design at its most iconic; exactly the sort of cabin in which I’d spent many childhood summers.
“They’re just like Polish trains,” I said. “Or at least like old, Communist Polish trains. I’ve been on loads of them. I remember we once had to spend the entire journey down to the south hiding our puppy from the guard because animals weren’t allowed on board.”
I think she nodded, storing away yet another detail from what she likes to think of as her husband’s exotic past.
I pointed in the direction of a small, roughly square-shaped cabinet in the corner. “If you lift the lid off that, you’ll find a sink.”
A moment later, she’d swung the cabinet cover back on its hinges to reveal two grimy taps perched over a cracked, off-white basin. “A bit like on the Indian sleepers,” she said, “except this one smells awful.” She pushed the lid back down, but didn’t quite manage to suppress the odour of rust and stagnant water.
“That could be ’cause it also makes a handy urinal.”
“Charming!” With a laugh, she sat back down on the bunk and rubbed her hands together. “Well, we were more impressed with the trains in Rajasthan, weren’t we?”
“Definitely,” I muttered, “and I don’t think...” I flicked a few more switches above the doorway, “I’m going to get these lights to work.”
“Great. The one thing we haven’t got is a torch.”
“Maybe it’s just a fuse or something. I’ll ask the guard to have a look once we’ve set off.” I sat down beside her, pulled her head close to my chest, locked my hands around her body and cast aside any concerns about the fact that my clothes were badly in need of the services of a washing machine. “We are doing the right thing, aren’t we?”
“Oh babe, come on, stop now. We’ve made a decision. No looking back.”
“I know, I know... it’s just that...” I sighed. “I mean, say we get to Belgrade and find out we can’t get an onward booking for days.”
“That’s not going to happen.”
“Actually, there’s a very good chance it will happen. There’s thousands of volcano people across Europe, trying to get home on the trains.”
“Then we’ll just have to sit tight in Belgrade for a while.”
“And in the mean time, the planes might start flying again.”
She pulled herself out from my arms and looked into my eyes, or at least I think she did. The gloom was deepening by the minute. “Look, we said from the very start that this may turn out to be a bad decision. But we’re making it based on the information we’ve got now, which is that the volcano may keep going for weeks. And BA have said they’ll reimburse us...”
“If that’s true...”
“Well, they’ve said it, so they’ll have a fight on their hands if they try to back-pedal. And we’ve just got to make the best of it and get home as quickly as we can.”
I managed a nod.
“And anyway, be grateful we didn’t end up in that other carriage.”
“Oh my God, I know!” Somehow – and we never did find out how – we’d managed to buy tickets for a double sleeper cabin, but we weren’t wise to this fact when we’d first got on the train. Our reading of the illogical numbering system on the tickets had suggested that we were destined to spend the next night and day of our lives sitting – I repeat: sitting, not sleeping – in a six-person compartment that looked about as comfortable as wearing a neck brace. Luckily, the passenger whose seats we’d commandeered under false pretences – a Serbian lady with a spine-chilling repertoire of frowns – shooed us out of the way and sent us in the direction of the guard who – with what we came to learn was characteristic ebullience – showed us to some bunks and blankets. “I’ll bet that woman wishes she’d never said anything.”
Lin managed another chuckle. “Well, I’m glad she did, because I’m telling you now: I think that carriage would have tested even my patience.”
We sat in silence for a few more moments and although I racked my brains to think of something optimistic to contribute to the shadows deepening around us, my mouth remained shut. In the end, as always, it was Lin who restored some sense of perspective.
“You never know,” she said, “it might be quite fun to spend a night in Budapest.”
“We’re not going to Budapest.”
“Oh.”
“We’re going to Belgrade.”
“In Hungary?”
“No, in Serbia.”
“Oh, right.” Pause. “But I thought you said this train’s going to Budapest.”
“No, I said part of it is going to split off and go to Bucharest.”
“Oh, right... When’s that going to happen?”
“No idea.”
“But we’re in the right carriage for Budapest?”
“Belgrade.”
“I meant Belgrade.”
“I certainly hope we are.” I sighed. “And by the way...”
“Yes?”
“We’ve already been to Budapest.”
“Have we?”
“Yes. It’s the capital of Hungary. You took me there for my birthday once. And although we enjoyed it, we said we wouldn’t be in a hurry to go back any time soon.”
She let the words drift between us. “I thought that was Bulgaria.”
“No. We haven’t been to Bulgaria yet. We’re going to pass through it on this train.” Little did we know at the time that “pass through” was a term to be interpreted with considerable laxity.
I stepped out into the corridor. “I’d better see the guard about these lights.” As I walked down to the end of the carriage – whose most attractive features were some strip lighting and a line of thin-framed, pull-down windows – the train lurched into life and, with a groan of pre-Glasnost gears, pulled out of Sirkeci.
“We’re off!” someone shouted with a level of enthusiasm bordering on hysteria.
The conversation with the Serbian guard was brief, but surprisingly coherent, considering the density of the vodka fog which emanated from his mouth. He spoke some basic Polish which – when coupled with the language’s similarity to Serbian – meant that communication wasn’t anywhere as difficult as it could have been. With a few elegant hand gestures and the repetition of words like Å›wiatÅ‚o and nie ma, I soon conveyed the essence of the situation, although all I got in response was a smile and a shake of the head.
Somewhere behind me, excited voices yelled. “Look, there’s the Blue Mosque. And there’s the Haghia Sophia.” But I didn’t have any time for such trivialities and was being compelled to abandon my most refined Marceau miming in favour of frantic attempts to show the guard that without lights, I wouldn’t be able to see anything – both hands across eyes; head darting left and right – that I wouldn’t be able to read – hands open before face like a book; quizzical expression – and that I might even stumble and fall – comedy trip on fictitious banana-skin.
The guard furrowed his brow, nodded and patted both my shoulders with his great paws. I think somewhere, his drink-addled mind had grasped that he was dealing with a pretty desperate inmate.
He motioned me back along the corridor – a brief glance through the windows confirmed that, yes, hallelujah, we were indeed heading out through Istanbul’s megalithic urban sprawl – and started flicking and tapping switches as soon as he entered our cabin.
“Can he fix it?” Linda asked, with a composure that suddenly made me understand that she wasn’t especially worried about the lack of lights at all: she was more concerned about the effect she knew it would have on me.
“I don’t know. He seemed pretty surprised that they’re not working. Maybe he’s got a spare bulb kit somewhere.”
The guard gave us a few frowns, a few raised eyebrows, a few shrugged shoulders. Or perhaps he didn’t. Things were now so dark, I could’ve been standing next to a polar bear, for all I knew. But I’m pretty sure he turned to face us and gave us another of his nothing’s-wrong-with-the-world smiles.
“Light,” he said.
“Yes?”
“No work.”
“I know.” Anxious glances. “You fix?”
With a wave of a hand and a guffaw that was probably heard in the upper reaches of the ash cloud, he proclaimed, “No!” and started walking away.
I scrambled to my feet. Cue: comedy banana skin. “But, wait, wait...” How to explain the enormity of this predicament? “There’s... there’s no light!”
He spread his arms open wide, gave the Cheshire cat another run for his money and boomed out one single word. “Romantica!”
Linda and I looked at each other, took a deep breath, and then, in a flash of radiance from outside, caught sight of the grimy floor. Our trip to Belgrade was going to be – in the most diplomatic sense of the word – rather interesting.
But perhaps you’d like to know how we ended up on this train the first place? Perhaps you’d prefer a more sequential, less post-modern version of a tale which includes a quest for the perfect wash-and-blow-dry in Sofia, angry exchanges with the Foreign Office and a tarot-card reader from Somerset? Perhaps you’re interested in finding out that, in spite of the blinkered way we navigate through our everyday lives, most people out there are capable of displaying tremendously moving levels of kindness and helpfulness? Well, are you? Yes? Right then, if you’re agreeable, I need to start by taking you back a few days...
© Dariush Alavi 2010
14 May 2010
Considered Less Important
So we've ended up with a coalition. Well, I don't think that's such an awful result. I've made a few snide remarks about the 'Nick n Dave' show on Twitter, but the truth is that I don't see why joint governments are necessarily ineffectual. I may not agree with many fundamental Tory philosophies (such as the view that we're not European) but if we must have Cameron at No. 10, then maybe we should be grateful that we've also got the LibDems to dilute the most regressive excesses of Conservatism. Compromise isn't as dirty a word as politicians would have us believe and I, for one, am a firm believer in the idea that creative tension between passionate individuals can achieve amazing outcomes (and no, I didn't just steal that line from a fortune cookie). Mind you, I hope the new cabinet has got a superb PR team on its side: they're going to need as much sugar-coating as they can find to get the public to swallow the inevitable 'austerity measures'.
Perhaps I'm exaggerating, but I think one amazing outcome has been achieved already: for the last few weeks, people up and down the country have engaged with the political process. They've discussed the track record of their local MPs. They've made coherent judgements about the merits of one party against another. They've analysed voting intentions with colleagues, friends and loved ones. Until now, these were activities best left to those grumpy garlic-eaters across the Channel. Sure, hundreds of people complained that an episode of Eastenders was considered less important than Gordon Brown's farewell speech, but many thousands more tuned in to see the culmination of a series of events which, they knew, would have genuine implications for the future of this country.
I remember when I was at Uni, one of my lecturers frequently complained that young people had lost sight of the political dimension of the life around them.
"Do you mean political with a small 'p' or a big 'P'?" I once asked him.
"I don't make a distinction between politics with a small 'p' and politics with a big 'P'," he said, "and that's precisely the point I'm making."
Back then, I could only dimly see what he meant. Fast forward several years, and maybe, just maybe, British society is on the brink of comprehending that, whether we like or not, we are all political animals.
---
In other news, I should just mention that I'm still working on my memoir of our ash cloud rail journey from Istanbul. Several people have written to ask for more details about the odyssey. Please bear with me a little longer; I hope to post something about the trip soon.
Share
Perhaps I'm exaggerating, but I think one amazing outcome has been achieved already: for the last few weeks, people up and down the country have engaged with the political process. They've discussed the track record of their local MPs. They've made coherent judgements about the merits of one party against another. They've analysed voting intentions with colleagues, friends and loved ones. Until now, these were activities best left to those grumpy garlic-eaters across the Channel. Sure, hundreds of people complained that an episode of Eastenders was considered less important than Gordon Brown's farewell speech, but many thousands more tuned in to see the culmination of a series of events which, they knew, would have genuine implications for the future of this country.
I remember when I was at Uni, one of my lecturers frequently complained that young people had lost sight of the political dimension of the life around them.
"Do you mean political with a small 'p' or a big 'P'?" I once asked him.
"I don't make a distinction between politics with a small 'p' and politics with a big 'P'," he said, "and that's precisely the point I'm making."
Back then, I could only dimly see what he meant. Fast forward several years, and maybe, just maybe, British society is on the brink of comprehending that, whether we like or not, we are all political animals.
---
In other news, I should just mention that I'm still working on my memoir of our ash cloud rail journey from Istanbul. Several people have written to ask for more details about the odyssey. Please bear with me a little longer; I hope to post something about the trip soon.
Share
05 April 2010
Grant More Power
If I had more time, I'd write a longer a post to express the outrage - the complete and utter red-faced spitting outrage - that overcomes me when I read articles like the ones below, but thankfully, I'm fortunate enough to be able to spend the next few days doing something much more pleasant. However, I feel duty-bound to bring these two items of 'news' to your attention, and I apologise in advance for any outrage you may experience when you click on the links. If, after reading the two pieces, you DO NOT experience any outrage, I would be very interested to hear from you.
Here they are: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263581/An-iPhone-spy-teacher-Pupils-told-email-secret-verdicts-staff-DURING-lessons.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/apr/03/children-job-interviews-questions.
The Divine L said it best: all this is yet another example of adults' desire to shake off the responsibility that comes with being adults. For whatever reason - fear / uncertainty / the worst kind of moral relativism - we no longer seem to want to impose our voice upon children, and instead we grant more power to their half-formed, inexperienced, infantile little squeaks. And we dare to call ourselves a nation that cares about the welfare of young people.
Here they are: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263581/An-iPhone-spy-teacher-Pupils-told-email-secret-verdicts-staff-DURING-lessons.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/apr/03/children-job-interviews-questions.
The Divine L said it best: all this is yet another example of adults' desire to shake off the responsibility that comes with being adults. For whatever reason - fear / uncertainty / the worst kind of moral relativism - we no longer seem to want to impose our voice upon children, and instead we grant more power to their half-formed, inexperienced, infantile little squeaks. And we dare to call ourselves a nation that cares about the welfare of young people.
29 March 2010
A Communal Notion
BBC4 recently concluded a series of three superb films by Vanessa Engle which attempted to chart the history and development of the feminist movement from about the 60s. The first episode, 'Libbers', consisted of interviews with some of the undisputed heroines of the field, including Germaine Greer and Marilyn French; the final instalment, 'Activists', portrayed a group of women currently trying to keep the feminist spirit alive in Britain. Taken as a pair, the films provided a thoroughly fascinating examination of how society has changed over the last few decades... and by that I certainly don't mean that it's become better.
The women shown in the first episode were intellectual powerhouses. By and large, they managed to obtain the very best education that society was willing to offer them at the time and they shaped themselves into real forces to be reckoned with. They had a sense of purpose which - although it unquestionably stemmed from personal experiences - somehow embraced a communal notion of womanhood rather than placing excessive emphasis on the individual. They were charismatic. They were fearless. And they were driven by the conviction that the injustices which they saw around them should and could be dealt with.
The women presented as the activists of today come across as a very different breed. Perhaps that's partly because it's now relatively easy to place the likes of Greer on a pedestal and hail them as genuine pioneers. Maybe the current state of gender politics persuades us to view the past through forgiving, almost sentimental lenses. Or maybe today's feminists are just a bit wet. One thing's for sure: they're not intellectuals. Heaven forbid! I mean, we don't want today's role models going anywhere near geek territory, right? The whole lot of them put together don't have as much charisma as Ms Greer can muster with one raised eyebrow. And ultimately, they seem more interested in belonging to a cosy club than in putting the world to rights.
Maybe I'm being overly harsh in my assessment, but for some reason I simply wasn't convinced by all their protests against pornography, prostitution and sexism. They became animated and excited when dicussing what types of salads to prepare for a meeting, but when they were rattling off lists of all the social issues which they considered important, it sounded like little more than lip service. Or maybe I was just bothered by the fact that I thought they were all making a huge, fundamental error: excluding men.
The feminists of the 60s and the 70s couldn't have been more in touch with the realities of the lives they were trying to expose and criticise. The 21st century variety seem to have ignored that a) many men are on their side and b) many men are suffering the same treatment that was reserved only for women a few decades ago. In a time when you can walk into your local branch of TK Maxx and be confronted with a poster of a completely naked, fully objectified man, any sort of movement that claims to hold human dignity as one of its core values cannot afford to sideline half the population. If feminism is to enjoy a meaningful resurgence, it needs to realise that men should now be seen as potential allies.
The women shown in the first episode were intellectual powerhouses. By and large, they managed to obtain the very best education that society was willing to offer them at the time and they shaped themselves into real forces to be reckoned with. They had a sense of purpose which - although it unquestionably stemmed from personal experiences - somehow embraced a communal notion of womanhood rather than placing excessive emphasis on the individual. They were charismatic. They were fearless. And they were driven by the conviction that the injustices which they saw around them should and could be dealt with.
The women presented as the activists of today come across as a very different breed. Perhaps that's partly because it's now relatively easy to place the likes of Greer on a pedestal and hail them as genuine pioneers. Maybe the current state of gender politics persuades us to view the past through forgiving, almost sentimental lenses. Or maybe today's feminists are just a bit wet. One thing's for sure: they're not intellectuals. Heaven forbid! I mean, we don't want today's role models going anywhere near geek territory, right? The whole lot of them put together don't have as much charisma as Ms Greer can muster with one raised eyebrow. And ultimately, they seem more interested in belonging to a cosy club than in putting the world to rights.
Maybe I'm being overly harsh in my assessment, but for some reason I simply wasn't convinced by all their protests against pornography, prostitution and sexism. They became animated and excited when dicussing what types of salads to prepare for a meeting, but when they were rattling off lists of all the social issues which they considered important, it sounded like little more than lip service. Or maybe I was just bothered by the fact that I thought they were all making a huge, fundamental error: excluding men.
The feminists of the 60s and the 70s couldn't have been more in touch with the realities of the lives they were trying to expose and criticise. The 21st century variety seem to have ignored that a) many men are on their side and b) many men are suffering the same treatment that was reserved only for women a few decades ago. In a time when you can walk into your local branch of TK Maxx and be confronted with a poster of a completely naked, fully objectified man, any sort of movement that claims to hold human dignity as one of its core values cannot afford to sideline half the population. If feminism is to enjoy a meaningful resurgence, it needs to realise that men should now be seen as potential allies.
Labels:
BBC4,
documentary,
feminism,
Germaine Greer,
intellectualism,
men,
objectification,
pornography,
prostitution,
sexism,
TK Maxx,
Vanessa Engle,
women
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




